Mike Todd caught this the other day as well… Seth Godin asks, What happens when we organize? Seth opens his post with the observation that “Most power occurs because one side is better organized than the other.” This is a good description of an imbalanced power structure such as happens in the church where a divide exists between clergy and laity (Seth gives other examples). These structures are being upset in the present changing environment where Internet tools and a shift in values toward egalitarian ideals drive collaboration and spontaneous organization around a goal rather than simply falling into a rigid power or authority structure. Books such as Seth Godin’s Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us and Clay Shirkey’s Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations fill out the rest of the picture. The message is that the power structures are beginning to crumble under the realization that they really aren’t necessary, and their reaction to the changing milieu appears to be confusion — for the most part, there’s an instinctive desire to oppose this new disorganized organization, this “grassroots” movement that threatens to upset everything. Unfortunately for them, they are ill-equipped to meet this challenge; Ori Brafmann and Rod Beckstrom’s book The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations gives a good explanation of why this is so. Boiling it down to a single sentences though, one might latch onto the one which Seth Godin ended his post with, as I believe it to be highly accurate: “The system doesn’t know what to do with a movement.” They’re as ill-prepared for what’s coming at them as “Officer Opie” was.
Heh … my husband and my daughter had a rather protracted conversation about the precedents to this, this morning. She asked what a census is and he told her about it’s current purpose and it’s past purpose. Then they talked about how in the past people were valued by the amount of land they owned, and then only the men. The Industrial Revolution happened and the value of people changed from land to production-ability. Now both men and women have value (in the eyes of the state and/or industrial complex) based upon what they can produce in terms of it’s cash value. Then they moved on to the Information Revolution which we are currently in the midst of. Or perhaps just on the cusp of. We don’t yet know what the changes will be and how people will come to be valued as a result of it.
The problem is, of course, that none of these valuing systems are correct. They don’t base a person’s value where it belongs; that is, on the very fact of their creation and not on what they can or cannot do for someone else.
I guess the obvious question would be “How is/should the Church respond to the decentralization of the organization?”
Cheers,
Matt