First Century CE:
- Jewish nation carries out their own will and law… but it’s the Romans who actually have the power and make the laws.
- Jewish people recall having had their own land, having autonomy, being their own nation…. and have trouble accepting that it’s no longer the case.
- Scriptures have been augmented with a large body of interpretive tradition, yielding a large written and unwritten corpus of rules and regulations governs daily life and practice.
- Religious rulers and leaders hold authoritarian views toward the people they lead.
- Outward rules assumed to bring inward change, even righteousness, yield hypocrisy instead.
Jesus entered this scene and called the rulers “play-actors” and hypocrites, said they put undue burdens on the people, and other similar but often worse observations. He looked at their structures, rules, systems, and practices, and essentially said it needed to be reinvented in order to fulfil what God had intended to start off with.
Twenty-First Century CE:
- North American Christians wish to exert their influence over the laws of their land… but church and state are separate, and it’s the state who actually has the power and make the laws.
- North American people recall having established their own land and government, basing their nation on their christian heritage… but fail to appreciate or accept the fact they live in a post-christian society.
- Scriptures have been augmented with a large body of interpretive tradition, yielding a large written and unwritten corpus of rules and regulations governs daily life and practice.
- Religious rulers and leaders hold authoritarian views toward the people they lead.
- Outward rules assumed to bring inward change, even righteousness, yield hypocrisy instead.
Question…
Would Jesus’ message to us today be any different from the one he delivered in the First Century? Would his prescription for us today be the same?
Just wondering aloud, that’s all.
Subscribe Posts











September 9th, 2006 at 6:51 am
[IMG Subscribe (RSS)]Nathan Colquhoun [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]Pernell Goodyear [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]Pomomusings [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]TallSkinnyKiwi [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]The Journey [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]TheBolgBlog [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]Subversive Influence [IMG Subscribe (RSS)]Way Out West
October 3rd, 2006 at 10:14 am
This line of thought has been muddling around in my brain for a whle now. Our story doesn’t change much, does it? We are constantly running around building the City of Man to sate our thirst for the City of God. God faithfully and continually preserves His City despite our efforts.
October 3rd, 2006 at 10:27 am
Fascinating line of thought. The more things change…
October 3rd, 2006 at 10:59 am
Seems an especially appropriate question, given what’s going on in the US House of Representatives and the Republican Party at the moment.
October 3rd, 2006 at 1:35 pm
I have read some interesting studies about this point repeating itself throughout history. In fact, in the Axial Age, this trend repeated itself throughout most of the worlds religions. Karen Armstron’s new book talks about this somewhat. I have only read excerpts, but I hope to get it for Christmas.
Peace,
Jamie
October 5th, 2006 at 11:40 am
[...] From a Subversive Influence, here is an interestingly subversive politco-theological pondering. I wonder if its got anything to it. [...]