Seems some people don’t like what Piper had to say about the Tsunami… typically reading anti-Calvinist sentiment into his comments and missing the point. Whether one likes Reformed Theology or not, Piper’s response (about which I blogged favorably) is better than The Archbishop of Canterbury’s; he says, “The Asian tsunami disaster should make all Christians question the existence of God.” Uh, yeah, that’s a helpful response from someone to whom other believers will look for leadership. If he’d have stuck to saying it made him personally question God it would have been candidly honest; as it is, it’s destructive to the faith of others. Some under his care might do well to read Piper, who answers the question he cannot. This isn’t meant to be a defense of Piper’s response — I actually want to point you where the anti-Piper bloggers (who are not his typical audience anyway) generally point, to N.T. Wright’s response, which is a good piece that I quite liked. Wright explores the motif of the sea in scripture as representative of evil. I don’t think it answers any of the big questions, but it doesn’t really try, which is kinda nice, actually. Good thought-fodder.

Update: Just noted this post by Millinerd, a good answer without answering: “By holding in faith to God’s goodness and power while refusing to gloss the reality of evil one does lose the benefit of logical comprehension; but retained are the superior resources of hope, prayer, the mystery of the crucifix, and the call to do whatever one can do to help.”

Share This

Share this post with your friends!